XRP and the "Exit Liquidity" Trap: Why Are Long-Term Holders Doomed to Be the Scapegoats?
XRP: Seven Years of Holding = Zero Return
If you invested $10,000 in XRP in September 2018, after experiencing several bull and bear cycles, SEC lawsuits, and countless bullish hype, by today in 2025, your assets would still be worth about $10,000.
This is the harsh reality for XRP holders:
In 2018, it reached an all-time high of $3.8, then plummeted
In the 2021 bull market, it rebounded to $1.9, but still failed to return to its peak
From 2018 to 2025, the price mostly moved sideways or even declined
For long-term investors, this is almost a lost decade.
The Truth About "Exit Liquidity"
The so-called Exit Liquidity means that retail investors in the market are not "wealth accumulators," but rather provide an exit for insiders to offload their holdings:
Insiders sell → price drops
Retail investors buy in → long-term losses
The cycle repeats itself
XRP is the most typical example.
Insider Manipulation: The Real Driver of Price
Ripple co-founder Chris Larsen still holds billions of XRP, enough to move the market single-handedly.
In July 2025, he transferred about 50 million XRP (about $175 million)
Of which $140 million flowed directly into exchanges
As expected, the price of XRP dropped immediately
Meanwhile, on August 10, 2025, a group of whales sold about 470 million XRP, further impacting market liquidity. And once again, retail investors were the ones buying in.
Not Just XRP: More "Exit Tokens"
This model is not unique to XRP; other projects have similar issues:
Cardano (ADA): Long claimed to be "academically driven," but ecosystem progress is slow, lacks core applications, and is more about speculation
PulseChain: Launched by HEX founder Richard Heart, raised about $700 million through a "sacrifice" model, criticized as an insider arbitrage tool
Hedera (HBAR): Controlled by a council of 39 enterprises, it appears to be an "enterprise chain," but lacks decentralization and is more like a corporate alliance
Common Patterns in the Model
These projects often share several common features:
Insiders hold concentrated control
Continuous token unlocks → constant selling pressure
Lack of real demand and application adoption
Weak narratives, overvalued
As on-chain analyst ZachXBT said:
"XRP, ADA, PulseChain, and HBAR are all MLM (multi-level marketing) chains, just providing exit liquidity for insiders."
Conclusion
The crypto market is harsh but real: tokens without real application support are merely tools for insiders to cash out.
The seven-year story of XRP reminds us:
Long-term holding does not equal wealth accumulation
Without adoption and utility, ROI is zero
Retail investors are easily sacrificed as "exit liquidity"
For investors, the only way out is:
DYOR (Do Your Own Research)
Choose projects carefully
Avoid wasting time and money on tokens harvested by insiders
Otherwise, what you invest is not an investment, but simply liquidity for others to realize their profits.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Fed Voting Member Harker: Fighting Inflation Requires Faster, More Frequent Small Rate Adjustments, Be Vigilant Against Inflation Expectations Becoming Entrenched
Cleveland Federal Reserve President Loretta Mester believes that inflation pressures have spread beyond the energy sector, with AI investments and tariffs driving up costs. To prevent high inflation from becoming entrenched in the economy, she suggests that the Federal Reserve should consider smaller, quicker, and more frequent rate adjustments, rather than waiting for inflation pressures to accumulate and then taking larger actions. She did not explicitly support an interest rate hike in October, emphasizing policy transparency: explaining the response mechanism does not equate to committing to a specific rate path.
Will the US cancel 20-year Treasury bonds? BNP Paribas: It may trigger market panic; Citibank: Positioning 20-year bonds to outperform 10-year bonds
There are market rumors that the U.S. Treasury is considering cutting back or canceling the issuance of 20-year Treasury bonds, which were reinstated in 2020. The yield on 20-year bonds has long been higher than both 10-year and 30-year bonds, resulting in a "hump" in the yield curve and higher financing costs. The market is closely watching this Friday’s routine survey questionnaire, as well as whether a clear signal will be released in the quarterly refunding statement on November 4. Citi suggests positioning in advance, but BNP Paribas warns that such a move could be interpreted as a panic signal that policy tools have been exhausted.

Bitcoin price volatility accompanies a 6% drop as sentiment turns neutral
WF stock trades at $36, up 196.78%, with daily RSI at 97.86
