1 to 4: Bitcoin Drops Once, Treasury Companies Drop Four Times
MetaPlanet and other Bitcoin Treasury Companies face amplified volatility, with internal corporate decisions often driving deeper declines than Bitcoin itself. For investors, BTCTCs are a double bet on BTC and company execution.
Over the past 10 weeks, Bitcoin Treasury Companies (BTCTCs) stocks have plummeted by 50–80%, sparking widespread concerns among investors.
The case of Metaplanet (MTPLF) highlights the harsh volatility, as within 18 months, it went through 12 “mini-bear markets.” This raises the question: do BTCTC stocks mirror Bitcoin’s volatility, or do internal corporate factors also drive them?
When BTCTCs’ Stocks Are Riskier Than Bitcoin Itself
In the past 10 weeks, Bitcoin Treasury Companies (BTCTCs) stocks have recorded 50–80% declines, which has triggered a wave of concern across the investment community. Metaplanet ($MTPLF) is a clear example of this severe volatility.
Price fluctuations of Bitcoin Treasury Companies’ stocks. Source:
X
Within 18 months, Metaplanet endured 12 mini-bear markets — ranging from single-day drops to prolonged downtrends. On average, each decline was about -32.4% and lasted 20 days. Notably, the worst phase saw the stock decline by 78.6% in 119 days (July 25 – November 21, 2024).
Metaplanet stock price. Source:
Mark Moss
The question is whether these downturns fully affect Bitcoin’s (BTC) own volatility.
According to analyst Mark Moss, data shows that only 41.7% (5 out of 12) of Metaplanet’s corrections coincided with Bitcoin’s down cycles. Conversely, more than half were triggered by internal corporate factors, including option issuance, capital raising, or the shrinkage of the “Bitcoin premium” — the gap between the stock price and the actual value of BTC holdings.
Still, Mark observed a partial link.
Specifically, Metaplanet’s deepest declines (such as -78.6% or -54.4%) tended to overlap with significant Bitcoin drawdowns. This suggests that once BTC enters a high-volatility phase, BTCTC stocks often remain weak for longer, suffering a double hit from both market and internal dynamics.
Of course, Bitcoin remains the dominant influence. However, corporate variables act as the real “leverage,” amplifying BTCTCs’ volatility far beyond that of BTC itself. If Bitcoin can be understood through a 4-year cycle, BTCTCs behave like “4 cycles in a single year.”
“So, in summary, the partial synchronization suggests that BTC vol does influence Metaplanet…” noted Mark Moss.
For investors, holding BTCTCs is not merely a bet on Bitcoin’s price, but also a gamble on corporate capital management, financial structure, and business strategy.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
JPMorgan analyzes Applied (APLD.US): AI computing power business advancing rapidly, facing real-world challenges with billion-dollar financing
JPMorgan's Credit Research team has released a report providing a comprehensive analysis of company operations, project progress, financing pressures, and risks.

Crypto: Pump.fun Earns $18.6M Despite Memecoin Slump

Societe Generale's chief bear: The AI boom is replicating the Asian financial crisis, with the deadly “debt time bomb”
Société Générale Chief Strategist Edwards warns that the true trigger for the AI boom is not inadequate productivity, but whether cheap money can continue to flow. Overseas long-term government bond yields continue to rise, while AI giants are issuing large amounts of debt, with hundreds of billions of dollars in new bonds needing to be absorbed by the same group of buyers. This is reminiscent of the 1990s, when Asia maintained prosperity through short-term dollar borrowing.
