DBA Asset Management Pushes for 45% Supply Cut of Hyperliquid’s HYPE Token
Contents
Toggle- Quick Breakdown
- DBA seeks to reshape HYPE’s tokenomics
- Market reactions: support and criticism
- Hyperliquid’s rapid growth fuels debate
Quick Breakdown
- DBA proposes cutting HYPE supply by 45%, targeting emissions and community rewards allocations.
- Institutional backers support the move, arguing it would create more transparent tokenomics.
- Critics warn of risks, saying reduced emissions could limit Hyperliquid’s growth potential.
DBA seeks to reshape HYPE’s tokenomics
Crypto asset management firm DBA Asset Management has proposed a sweeping change to the tokenomics of HYPE, the native token of decentralized derivatives exchange Hyperliquid. The plan would eliminate 45% of the token’s total supply in a bid to strengthen investor confidence.
In a post on X, DBA investment manager Jon Charbonneau, alongside pseudonymous researcher Hasu, unveiled a three-part proposal which includes revoking authorization for all unminted HYPE set aside for future emissions and community rewards, burning all HYPE in the platform’s Assistance Fund and removing the fixed 1 billion HYPE supply cap.
https://t.co/IFVcvsalLd
— Jon Charbonneau 🇺🇸 (@jon_charb) September 22, 2025
Charbonneau argued the change would counteract distortions created by fully diluted valuation (FDV) metrics, which currently factor in tokens that have not yet entered circulation.
Market reactions: support and criticism
The move has attracted support from heavyweight institutional investors. Dragonfly’s Haseeb Qureshi backed the idea, calling the nearly 50% community allocation an “amorphous slush fund” that undermines transparent governance.
On the other hand, critics voiced strong opposition. Crypto commentator Mister Todd labeled the plan “a disaster,” warning that emissions are one of Hyperliquid’s most powerful growth levers. Some also argued that Hyperliquid should retain reserves to safeguard against potential regulatory fines.
Charbonneau responded that the proposal does not reduce HYPE’s availability in such scenarios, but rather changes how allocations are accounted for.
Hyperliquid’s rapid growth fuels debate
The proposal comes amid a period of strong momentum for Hyperliquid. In July alone, the platform processed $330 billion in trading volume with just 11 employees, underscoring its operational efficiency.
Meanwhile, Hyperliquid’s newly introduced USDH stablecoin has drawn significant institutional interest. A governance vote to determine its issuer saw participation from Paxos, Frax, Sky, Agora, and Native Markets, with the latter ultimately winning.
Charbonneau highlighted that USDH could significantly enhance Hyperliquid’s long-term revenue, making tokenomics reform even more crucial.
Take control of your crypto portfolio with MARKETS PRO, DeFi Planet’s suite of analytics tools.”
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
VVV crypto falls 25% – Could Venice Token’s buy zone be near $20?
As the FSD experience leaps forward and Optimus rushes toward mass production, a $30 billion standby credit facility offers strong support! Tesla (TSLA.US) accelerates Elon Musk's "physical AI master plan"
Tesla has secured $30 billion in new loans and credit lines as the electric vehicle manufacturer is ramping up its investments in artificial intelligence and robotics technology.
Gold price tests trend support as U.S. Treasury yields pull back
30-year US Treasury yield hits highest level since 2002, sell-off may continue under seasonal pressure
On Tuesday, the US 30-year Treasury yield rose to 5.62%, reaching its highest level since 2002, while the 10-year yield briefly touched 5.29%. High oil prices intensifying inflation expectations, robust economic data supporting rate hike expectations, concerns about fiscal sustainability, and a surge in corporate bond supply have collectively driven this round of sell-off. Historical seasonality indicates that September and October are typically the weakest months for US Treasuries, and volatility risk remains high going forward.
