Big Short Burry warns: Fed's RMP aims to cover up banking system vulnerabilities, essentially restarting QE
Michael Burry warned that the Federal Reserve has effectively restarted quantitative easing under the guise of "reserve management purchases," exposing that the banking system is still reliant on central bank liquidity for survival.
Michael Burry warns that the Federal Reserve has effectively restarted QE under the guise of "Reserve Management Purchases," exposing the banking system's ongoing reliance on central bank liquidity for survival.
Written by: Zhang Yaqi
Source: Wallstreetcn
Michael Burry, the real-life inspiration for the film "The Big Short," has issued a stern warning regarding the Federal Reserve's latest bond-buying plan. He points out that what is called "Reserve Management Purchases" (RMP) in fact reveals the deep-seated fragility of the US banking system. He believes this move is essentially a restart of quantitative easing (QE), intended to mask the liquidity crunch facing the banking sector, rather than being a routine operation as the Fed claims.
According to a previous article by Wallstreetcn, the Federal Reserve announced overnight that it would begin purchasing short-term Treasuries as needed to maintain an ample supply of reserves. The New York Fed simultaneously issued a notice, planning to buy $40 billion in short-term Treasuries over the next 30 days—its latest move since officially ending balance sheet reduction last week. This comes against the backdrop of unsettling rate volatility in the $12 trillion US repo market, with ongoing turmoil in money markets forcing the Fed to act more swiftly.
However, Burry believes this action precisely indicates that the banking system has yet to shake off the aftershocks of the 2023 small bank crisis. He warns that if the banking system still needs central bank "lifeblood" despite holding over $3 trillion in reserves, this is by no means a sign of strength, but rather a strong signal of systemic fragility.
Burry further analyzes that each round of crisis seems to force the Federal Reserve to permanently expand its balance sheet, or else risk triggering a banking funding crisis. The subsequent market reaction confirmed the tightness of liquidity: the yield on the US 2-month Treasury note jumped, while the 10-year Treasury yield fell. Meanwhile, volatility in the repo market persists, sparking concerns about year-end funding squeezes and forcing investors to reassess the stability of the financial system.
Covert Quantitative Easing and a Fragile Banking System
Burry questioned the Federal Reserve's use of the term "Reserve Management Purchases," interpreting it as a covert move aimed at stabilizing a banking sector that is still struggling. According to FRED data, before the 2023 crisis, US bank reserves stood at only $2.2 trillion, but have now climbed to over $3 trillion.
Burry issued a warning:
"If the US banking system cannot operate without more than $3 trillion in reserves or Federal Reserve 'life support,' this is not a sign of strength, but a sign of fragility."
He added that the current pattern seems to have evolved into the Fed needing to permanently expand its balance sheet after every crisis, or else face the risk of a banking funding chain rupture. While this mechanism partly explains the strong performance of the stock market, it also reveals the financial system's extreme dependence on central bank liquidity.
Market Operation Mismatch and Hedging Strategies
On the operational level, Burry emphasized a significant strategic shift between the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve: the Treasury prefers to sell more short-term bills, while the Fed focuses on buying these bills. This strategy helps avoid pushing up the 10-year Treasury yield. As the market expected, after the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, the yield on the US 2-month Treasury rose, while the 10-year Treasury yield fell.

Given the ongoing volatility in the repo market, some analysts expect the Federal Reserve may need to take even more aggressive action to avoid a year-end funding squeeze. Against this backdrop, Burry sees further evidence of underlying weakness in the financial system. He warns investors to be wary of misleading Wall Street advice to buy bank stocks, and reveals that for funds exceeding the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) $250,000 limit, he prefers to hold Treasury money market funds to mitigate risk.
It is worth noting that the main goal of "quantitative easing" (QE) is to lower long-term interest rates by purchasing long-term Treasuries and MBS, thereby stimulating economic growth. In contrast, RMP is more technical in nature, focusing on buying short-term Treasuries to ensure sufficient liquidity in the financial system's "pipes" and prevent accidents. According to Bank of America, based on the experience of 2019, liquidity injections will quickly push down the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR), while the federal funds rate (FF) will react more slowly. This "time lag" will create significant arbitrage opportunities for investors.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The Biggest Winner in the AI Fundraising Frenzy: Goldman Sachs Remains the King of Wall Street
In a single day, three AI mega financing deals totaling over $210 billion took place, and Goldman Sachs’ name appeared in each one: co-leading Meta’s $95 billion stock offering, exclusively overseeing the $40 billion chip financing structure for SpaceX, and serving as the lead bookrunner for Anthropic’s IPO. The AI financing supercycle is reshaping the competitive landscape on Wall Street, with Goldman Sachs taking the lead in turning relationship advantages into real money.

Anthropic may secure the "largest IPO in the stock market," but may not achieve "investment grade in the bond market"
The prospectus reveals that the company is already burdened with $6.2 billion in current liabilities, and its uninitiated lease commitments have soared from $50 billion to $321 billion, with an additional $77 billion in hidden borrowing options. The off-balance-sheet "chip financing" structure it has built in partnership with Broadcom is considered a potential counterparty risk due to circular trading. In comparison, SpaceX made a clear commitment to an investment-grade credit rating and successfully completed a $25 billion bond issuance. Anthropic, however, has barely mentioned an investment-grade credit rating, making it difficult for bond market buyers to price its offerings.
Goldman Sachs Connects $210 Billion Financing in One Day! AI 'Capital Relay' Boosts Confidence, Semiconductor Bull Market Narrative Strengthened
Goldman's $210 billion trading day was driven by the artificial intelligence financing boom. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. co-led Meta Platforms Inc.'s $95 billion equity offering, served as the sole structuring agent for SpaceX's $40 billion chip financing deal, and was appointed as the lead underwriter for Anthropic PBC's initial public offering. These deals have brought an unexpected windfall for Goldman, which is likely to earn at least tens of millions, if not hundreds of millions, of dollars as a result.
