A group of Republican senators in the United States has called for fairer capital requirements for banking activities linked to crypto assets. The senators argue that the current framework imposes excessively high capital burdens on financial institutions, effectively curtailing banks’ ability to operate in the crypto space. Their push comes as Congress actively debates wide-ranging digital asset regulations.
Republican senators push to lower 1,250 percent crypto capital rule
Republican senators address regulators
Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis, a longtime advocate on digital assets, led the initiative along with five other Republican senators. The group addressed their letter to Michelle Bowman, Vice Chair for Supervision at the Federal Reserve, FDIC Chairman Travis Hill, and Jonathan Gould, Acting Comptroller of the Currency.
The senators stressed that banks should hold capital in line with actual risk levels, noting that treating all digital asset activities as inherently high-risk is misguided.
The group openly criticized the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s imposition of a 1,250 percent risk weighting on some digital assets. They argued that this blanket figure defines the entire sector as extremely risky without adequate distinction, causing a de facto ban in practice.
Glossary: The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision is known for setting international standards on banks’ capital adequacy and risk management. While its decisions are not laws, they heavily influence national regulations in many countries.
Tokenized securities cited as precedent
The senators urged regulators to extend the recent treatment of tokenized securities to a broader range of digital assets. In March, the Federal Reserve, FDIC, and OCC announced that tokenized securities would generally be subject to the same capital treatment as traditional securities. The senators underlined that this principle should also apply to other digital asset activities.
According to the Republican senators, banks need clear and predictable rules to expand their crypto asset services on balance sheets. The group maintained that capital requirements should be based on specific risk factors rather than a blanket ban approach, allowing regulated financial institutions to participate more safely in digital asset markets.
The senators stated that balanced rules would enable banks to offer crypto services under supervision and help keep commercial activity within the regulated financial system.
Timing coincides with Congress agenda
The timing of the letter has drawn attention. Congress is currently considering broad digital asset regulations, which could give banks greater freedom to conduct crypto activities through their balance sheets. The senators emphasized that capital rules need to be clarified before new authorities are introduced.
The initiative has backing from Dan Sullivan, Bill Hagerty, Bernie Moreno, Ted Budd, and Jon Husted, indicating that the issue has evolved beyond technical banking debates and is now part of broader Republican pressure on regulatory agencies.
Regulators’ response awaited
The senators contend that any capital framework should balance genuine risks and the market’s potential. They argued that current standards do not reflect present market conditions and could push some activities outside the regulated banking sector.
The debate is expected to intensify in coming days. Michelle Bowman, Travis Hill, and Jonathan Gould are scheduled to testify before the House Financial Services Committee on Thursday. Their testimony is seen as likely to influence the next steps in the US banking system’s treatment of crypto assets.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Is a new wave of sell-offs approaching? The ultimate rival of the AI bull market emerges—The "global anchor of asset pricing" breaks through the 5% super threshold
After the 10-year US Treasury yield breaks back above the critical 5% mark, it is more likely to usher in a period of high-level tug-of-war and accelerated asset differentiation. Especially before energy shocks and the significantly eased large-scale expansion of the US fiscal deficit, the conditions to quickly replicate the sharp yield decline seen at the end of 2023 are not yet fully in place.

Anthropic releases another article: What will the economy look like in the AI era?
Anthropic's economics team has released an AI economic scenario model, centered around three scenarios: moderate and gradual growth, transformative changes with GDP doubling, and an extreme situation with 15% annual growth but massive job losses among knowledge workers. The model treats work as "bundles of tasks" and analyzes AI’s enhancement and substitution effects on different types of tasks. Anthropic emphasizes that the economic outlook for 2030 is not predetermined; the key lies in how the dividends from AI are widely shared.
"New Federal Reserve News Agency": Waller's Rate Hike "Has No Way Back", Trump's "Trust" Faces Test
Nick Timiraos believes that after the higher-than-expected August CPI, the probability of the Federal Reserve raising interest rates this week has surged, while Waller’s hawkish stance on inflation has left himself almost "no leeway." With seven weeks before the election, whether or not Waller raises rates will directly test how long Trump's “trust” in him can last. Previously, Waller maintained a balance between the White House and the Federal Reserve by “talking less and avoiding provocation,” but after this meeting, silence will no longer serve as his shield.
Trump Opposes AI "Guardrails": Congress Pushes Legislation for Restrictions, Deepening Bipartisan Divide
U.S. President Trump opposes setting guardrails for artificial intelligence (AI), putting him at odds with a growing number of bipartisan lawmakers. As the midterm elections approach, voters' concerns about AI safety have intensified their doubts about this technology.

