Fed: Flexible reserve management purchases and balance sheet risks – BNY
BNY Markets’ John Velis and David Tam discuss Federal Reserve reserve management purchases (RMPs), noting that new qualifying language suggests the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) is more comfortable with system reserves and may adjust RMPs more flexibly. They highlight that reduced RMPs have already calmed repo volatility, but caution that any pause could spur market speculation about an impending balance sheet runoff, requiring clear Fed communication.
RMPs signal evolving Fed stance
"The addition signals that the FOMC is now more comfortable with the aggregate level of reserves in the system and the added qualifier “when appropriate” suggests that continued purchases might not be necessary going forward."
"The additional language should also reinforce the idea that the Fed has broad latitude to change the size of RMPs on a month-to-month basis."
"A further reduction or full-blown halt in RMPs would be at the very least evidence that the Fed feels the quantity of reserves is sufficient to maintain the ample framework."
"If the Fed were to pause RMPs next month, we imagine that speculation that the Fed was commencing balance sheet runoff would take off, even if the Fed’s intentions in pausing RMPs were narrower."
"We would look to Fed communication or the work out of the balance sheet taskforce for clarity if and when the Fed pauses RMPs but are concerned that this might not be forthcoming by next month."
(This article was created with the help of an Artificial Intelligence tool and reviewed by an editor.)
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
High interest rates are not the "end" of US stocks? Is profitability the real key?
JPMorgan believes that profit growth is the key factor determining the resilience of U.S. stock valuations. Data since 1950 shows an "inverted U-shaped" relationship between the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield and S&P 500 valuations. Based on current profit levels, yields would need to reach about 5%-6% to significantly compress valuations. As long as profit growth remains above 15%, there is still room for valuations to be re-rated. If the yield curve steepens in a bear market, cyclical sectors such as energy and financials will benefit more; if it flattens, technology stocks will have a relative advantage.
The "Outlier" Investment Art in the New Era of Berky

Chevron (CVX.US) explores alternative hedging for Middle East supply disruptions: targets Argentina and the Mediterranean to drive global LNG growth, seeks deal with India
Chevron is focusing on Argentina and the Mediterranean region, seeking global growth in liquefied natural gas, and plans to reach an agreement with India.

Expert Drops a Bullish Yet Scary Prediction for ETH Price in 2027, $10,000 ATH to $800 Black Swan Event?

