Trump-backed crypto ethics rule puts DOJ in charge of enforcement, prohibits federal officials from issuing cryptocurrencies
Newly approved ethics language signed by President Donald Trump would prohibit federal officials from issuing cryptocurrencies, and would put the Justice Department in charge of enforcing it, not states, which could become a sore spot in trying to pass broader cryptocurrency legislation.
Talk of the ethics language came out during an industry call on Tuesday afternoon with White House top crypto adviser Patrick Witt.
The language would prohibit federal officials such as members of Congress, the president and vice president from issuing digital assets, three sources told The Block on Tuesday. The language also would put the Justice Department as the chief enforcer of the provision, not state attorneys general, which could become a flashpoint since Democrats have argued for states to have some control, two of the sources confirmed.
Earlier in the day on Tuesday, Sen. Angela Alsobrooks, D-Md., and one of the main negotiators of the Clarity Act, said she had concerns over who would enforce the ethics provision. At issue are Trump’s memecoins and his family’s company, World Liberty Financial. Financial disclosures released last month showed that Trump received millions of dollars tied to WLF, intensifying debate over ethics safeguards.
"This DOJ enforcing an ethics provision? That's an unserious offer, and I wouldn't support the bill if that's the language. But we'll keep working from that floor to reach an agreement that holds us all accountable," Alsobrooks said in a statement to The Block.
The White House did not confirm wording in the ethics provision, but said it was working with lawmakers to pass the Clarity Act into law and blamed Democrats if the bill does not pass.
"If Senate Democrats block this historic legislation after the administration has bent over backward to accommodate their concerns, stakeholders should make no mistake: it is the Democrats who are blocking this legislation because they were never serious about a legislative outcome," a White House official said in an email.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Can Zcash Really Follow Bitcoin? This Model Puts ZEC to the Test

TAO Drops 7% After the Raydium Rally: Is a Bigger Move Coming?

Bitcoin: $85M whale buy meets Fed FUD – Is BTC setting up a bear trap?

SHIB Bulls Face a Test as 463 Billion Tokens Move in Just 24 Hours

