Senate Banking Committee pushes for rapid legislative action on crypto market framework
The Senate Banking Committee released a seven-point framework for digital asset market structure and heard testimony urging Congress to translate those principles into statute without delay on June 23.
Committee Chair Tim Scott and Senators Cynthia Lummis, Thom Tillis, and Bill Hagerty set out a plan that draws a statutory line between digital asset securities and commodities. However, there is no draft of a bill as of press time.
Furthermore, the plan allocates jurisdiction to existing regulators instead of creating a single crypto agency while updating registration paths so compliant issuers can raise capital under an exemption tailored to distributed-ledger projects.
The document also calls for rules that preserve self-custody, recognize the difference between centralized firms and decentralized protocols, and treat tokenization as an efficiency upgrade rather than a novel financial product.
Hearing on bipartisan regulatory effort
Witnesses at the Digital Assets Subcommittee hearing agreed that Congress needs to create a framework that clarifies regulations and classifications for the industry.
Ryan VanGrack, Coinbase’s vice president of legal, told lawmakers:
“More than 52 million Americans, one in five adults, now own digital assets.”
VanGrack said that the current ambiguity in rules leads to loopholes and gaps that are exploitable by bad actors. Former Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) chair Rostin Behnam, now a Georgetown fellow, echoed the sentiment and added that the non-security segment “still lacks a market structure regime.”
Both described a traditional hierarchy of customer, broker, exchange, clearinghouse, and custodian that can migrate to crypto with minimal change.
Greg Xethalis, general counsel at Multicoin Capital, warned that unclear guidance pushes founders and capital overseas and forces US start-ups to “get a law-firm opinion to launch” even simple projects.
Sarah Hammer of the Wharton School pointed to Singapore’s licensing model and strict anti-fraud standards as proof that clear obligations can coexist with innovation.
Consumer safeguards and regulatory coordination
The principles sheet proposes innovation-friendly registration for intermediaries, right-sized capital and segregation rules, and explicit bankruptcy protection for customer assets. Behnam called segregation the “number-one issue” for user protection.
The senators also endorsed a targeted anti-money laundering package that extends the Bank Secrecy Act and IEEPA tools to offshore entities that interact with US users, mirroring points raised by Hammer on the need to deter fraud without stifling compliant activity.
For federal agencies, the plan recommends safe-harbor pilots, no-action letters, and inter-agency coordination to avoid duplicative exams. The language echoes VanGrack’s view that the United States can “do better” than a patchwork of enforcement actions.
Senator Hagerty cited last week’s 51-23 GENIUS Act vote as evidence that bipartisan momentum exists. Lummis, who co-sponsors a comprehensive bill with Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, urged colleagues to keep that bipartisan channel open despite political friction.
Committee members also pressed witnesses on practical benefits. Xethalis argued that decisive legislation would prevent Europe from setting global norms, as occurred with internet commerce rules, and would forestall a replay of the lag in 5G and semiconductor leadership.
Senator Angela Alsobrooks inquired about tangible benefits for households. Speakers highlighted lower settlement costs, faster remittances, and new credit rails.
Path to draft text
Staff will now translate the principles into statutory language that assigns the Securities and Exchange Commission authority over asset fundraising and the secondary trading of securities tokens. At the same time, the CFTC would supervise commodity tokens and derivative products.
Lawmakers indicated that customer asset segregation, capital requirements scaled to risk, and a tailored exemption for token sales will form the foundation of the draft.
The next step is to finalize a market structure law, which would join a similar proposal introduced by House Republicans on May 5.
The post Senate Banking Committee pushes for rapid legislative action on crypto market framework appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
AI Capital Expenditure Faces a Dilemma: Accelerating Puts Pressure on Cash Flow, Slowing Down Undermines the Growth Narrative
Nomura Securities believes that the AI investment narrative is mired in an internal contradiction: if hyperscale cloud providers accelerate capital expenditures, their free cash flow will continue to be drained, raising doubts about the sustainability of financing; if they slow down, it would indicate a loss of confidence in AI demand and profitability expectations. Both paths lead to sell-offs. The crowded long positions accumulated during the AI agent boom in September have triggered large-scale stop-losses under negative catalysts, spreading to US Treasury bonds, exchange rates, and commodity markets, resulting in systemic deleveraging.

Amazon (AMZN.US) CEO: AWS cloud computing capacity is fully booked until 2027, and a large amount of capacity has already been committed by customers for 2028
On Friday, Jassy stated that with the growing demand for artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure, Amazon AWS cloud computing capacity is virtually sold out through 2027, and a significant portion of 2028 capacity has also been pre-booked by customers.

AI trading collapse: Will Anthropic postpone its "Super IPO"? The "scheduled listing date" in mid-November is approaching.
The time window is extremely tight—according to SEC regulations, the S-1 filing must be submitted by next week at the latest, and prediction markets estimate the probability of a listing within the year at around 80%. The sell-off in the AI sector has cast a shadow over the listing prospects, and the previous plan to go public in September has already fallen through. Several market participants say that Anthropic may face pressure to delay its listing, but some analysts point out that the company's urgent need for capital may drive it to stick to the original plan.

